1400 years of violent jihad is also based on Islamic doctrine. Islamic supremacists know the content of their own doctrines all too well. The Sharia is incompatible with Western society. Freedom of speech — which includes the right to offend — is a cornerstone of any free society.

France was never the same after the Charlie Hebdo massacre, compounded by the beheading of schoolteacher Samuel Paty for showing Muhammad cartoons to his class. All across the Islamic world, with 50,000 Muslims in Bangladesh alone showed up to protest against Muhammad cartoons. Ditto for Pakistan. They had no problem with the executioner of Paty. They thought he deserved what he got for insulting Islam.

Pakistan and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation are at odds with free societies and continue to force the “Islamophobia” subterfuge on the West. Islam must not be insulted. Now, in a long overdue process:

France has launched an EU debate on the “extremely sensitive” issue of blasphemy and jihadist violence, in a move that risks further alienating European Muslims.

Christianity has been mocked and criticized on a routine basis, and antisemitism is commonplace at pro-Palestinian rallies. Yet no threat of violence comes from Christians or Jews over insults and criticism. There should be a zero tolerance, non-negotiable policy in every Western country, that criticizing Islam or any ideology is not off limits. The Macron-sparked debates about blasphemy and jihad should focus on the responsibility of immigrants from Muslim countries to assimilate like every other group; otherwise, the societal disruption will be immense.

France has also been cracking down on jihad-preaching mosques, and of course, is being labeled “Islamophobic” for doing so. In mainstream Islam, the Sharia (which includes violent jihad) is regarded as divine and immutable, so it is no surprise or secret that the majority of mosques are spreading Sharia ideology.

“Blasphemy and jihad: Macron launches EU debate,” by Andrew Rettman, EU Observer, January 12 2022:

France has launched an EU debate on the “extremely sensitive” issue of blasphemy and jihadist violence, in a move that risks further alienating European Muslims.

“Recent episodes have shown the extremely sensitive nature of the notion of blasphemy, which rallies and mobilises all streams of the radical Islamist scene,” the French EU presidency said in a recent memo to member states.

“This evolution of the threat seems tangible in several European countries,” it added.

“Indeed, since early 2020, France, the United Kingdom, and Germany have faced a series of attacks whose execution seems to correspond to this phenomenon,” it said.

“Such is the case for the last seven attacks perpetrated in France – particularly the series of four attacks in the fall of 2020, including the beheading of teacher Samuel Paty,” France said.

The French memo, entitled Independent jihadist threat and seen by EUobserver, was circulated on 5 January.

It discussed trends since the fall of Islamic State [Isis], a jihadist regime in Iraq and Syria.

The “new type of threat” concerned individuals who had “shaken off the influence of terrorist organisations [such as Isis], both operationally and ideologically,” France warned.

“This type of attack … is perpetrated by isolated actors who have a tenuous or inexistent link to the radical movement and who were previously unknown to intelligence services”, it said.

Some attackers suffered from “psychological instability or even mental disorders,” it added.

“These terrorists use basic modi operandi, essentially with bladed or blunt weapons, which can however have a major symbolic impact when the attacks result in spectacular actions – such as beheadings – and target specific groups or people … [including] individuals singled out as ‘blasphemers’,” France also said.

“Do the member states share the above stated view?”, France asked.

The answers are to be discussed by EU home affairs ministers on 3 March.

And the talks are aimed at agreeing new EU recommendations on the “fight against terrorism” on 10 June.Witch-hunt?

Macron has in the past linked jihadist crimes to the rise of Salafism, a hardline Islamic ideology, in France’s suburban ghettoes, called “banlieues”.

And he has tried to stamp it out on the advice of Gilles Kepel, a Sorbonne-educated academic and former advisor.

But for other scholars of the subject, such as Olivier Roy from the European University Institute in Italy, the French leader has been misinformed.

Roy said it was the Barlevi school of Islam, which originated in Pakistan, that teaches the kind of thinking which led to Paty’s murder.

“The Salafis, on the contrary, reject any special devotion for the Prophet and do not stress the blasphemy dimension,” Roy told this website.

“Macron’s position seems to be that one should defend the right to blasphemy,” Roy added.

But if Macron’s version of defending “laïcité” [secularism] gains traction in European politics, it could alienate Muslims of any creed.

“Many young Muslims consider blasphemy against the Prophet as a way [for people] to express sheer Islamophobia and hatred for Muslims in general,” Roy said.

And in any case, France’s EU memo on the “new type of threat” posed by “isolated actors” got its facts wrong, according to Jessica White, an expert on terrorism at Rusi, a London-based think-tank.

The threat was “not new” and the attackers were “not often isolated”, even if they did not act in the name of Isis, she said.

“Blasphemy has been a fiercely-held and defended issue since the beginning of religion and is certainly not specific to Islam … in France, it isn’t new either,” she noted.