On a painful morning, Israel and the Victory Generation are getting the job done. Israel is burning Tehran, and Iran’s missile array is becoming less effective by the day.
What is the basic problem in Iran's conception of basing their war with Israel on missiles?
1. IRAN’S BALLISTIC MISSILES LACK COMPLEMENTARY ELEMENTS—THEY ARE NOT DECISIVE
They were meant to act alongside Hamas, Hezbollah, and Syria—either as an opening blow for an invasion by Hezbollah and Hamas or as a doomsday weapon with a chemical or nuclear warhead. But that infrastructure has collapsed: Hamas has been defeated on the ground, Hezbollah is worn down in the north, and Syria has fallen.
Missiles on their own cannot destroy airbases, power grids, or macro-strategic infrastructure—unless delivered in large, highly accurate volleys (dozens on a precise point), a capability that has been stripped from Iran.
In Iran itself, Israel has achieved air superiority in the west and is destroying launchers one after another. According to the IDF spokesperson, one-third of launchers have been destroyed.
Even if many missiles remain, there’s no way to launch hundreds at once. Without significant warheads and effective proxy support, the missiles are just tools for causing damage—painful, but not game-changing. They have no strategic power, no ability to bring decisive victory.
2. WHEN IRAN STRIKES ISRAELI CIVILIANS, IT EARNS PROPAGANDA—NOT VICTORY
When propaganda replaces real military success—it collapses.
This is a war between armies. Iran is downgrading itself to the level of the Houthis and Hamas, trying to generate Israeli public panic and boost morale at home.
Like a company selling a bad product but investing in flashy ads—shiny on the outside, hollow within. This is not a winning military doctrine. It’s theater. A bad French car ad with a blonde model—stuck on Highway 1.
3. NO RELEVANT PARALYZING CAPABILITY
We’re at war, and Iran’s goal isn’t closing stores—it’s destroying bases.
There is no such thing as hermetic defense; some missiles will always land. But even a precise ballistic missile can’t destroy a military base or strategic infrastructure. It can paralyze—but only temporarily. That’s why Israel keeps bombing airports and ports in Yemen and Syria. What is bombed can be repaired in a week.
In contrast to a ballistic missile, total air superiority—like the one the IDF has achieved up to Tehran—is a "bomb production line" that can lead to total paralysis or destruction.
4. ANALOGY: DISPOSABLE TOOLS
Missiles and drones are like disposable plates. Easy to use, no maintenance, no cleaning—but once they’re gone, you’re stuck and need to buy more. Sometimes there’s no store nearby. Sometimes there’s no stock.
A fighter jet is reusable. Costly to maintain, but it returns, re-engages, and operates. Building or buying bombs is easier than building ballistic missiles or advanced drones. Iran is deeply invested in a disposable munitions economy.
5. THAT’S WHY, AS ISRAEL INCREASES ITS FIREPOWER AND BURNS TEHRAN—BARRAGES ARE DECREASING
This is not a coincidence. It’s a limitation. The missiles aren’t infinite. Production isn’t fast enough. Manpower has been hit. There aren’t enough launchers. When you see fewer launches—it’s not restraint. They’re running out, and launch capacity is declining.
Israel is in a position of control and initiative—Iran is in a submissive, reactive stance.
This is what victory begins to look like. God willing. We must not be complacent, but we must not stop. We cannot pass this war to our children. We cannot leave the debts to the next generation.
The time for decisive victory is now, in the era of the Victory Generation and Greater Israel.