No one has ever produced a balance sheet titled “Profit from the Israel–Arab conflict.” But pretending the money isn’t there is intellectual dishonesty.
For more than seven decades, this conflict has been one of the most reliable, reusable, and emotionally charged products in global journalism. It never goes out of date. It requires little historical accountability. And most importantly for legacy media, it reliably generates clicks, ratings, donations, grants, and institutional relevance.
Every escalation produces the same cycle: breaking news banners, endless panels, dramatic imagery, “context” segments recycled from previous wars, and opinion columns written before the smoke has cleared. The framing rarely changes, but the revenue streams do.
Major outlets like Reuters, Associated Press, cable networks, public broadcasters, NGOs with media arms, and think tanks all benefit from sustained attention. Conflict coverage is expensive—but it is also one of the highest-return investments in modern journalism.