Is there some version of ironclad and unwavering solidarity that covers an arms embargo?
How much contempt for their voters do politicians like this have? Almost limitless.
Rep. Nancy Pelosi, along with Rep. Jamie Raskin and others, just signed a letter calling for an arms embargo on Israel alongside Rep. Ilhan Omar, Rep. Rashida Tlaib and other ‘Squad’ members.
After the Iranian attacks, Pelosi and Raskin tweeted about their “unwavering” and “ironclad” solidarity with the Jewish State.
“America’s support for Israel’s security is resolute as we condemn Iran’s horrible attacks,” Pelosi’s account tweeted. “Our commitment to the Israeli people and support of their defense remains unwavering – and we must pass the Senate’s national security supplemental.”
“This direct attack on our ally Israel by Iran, an authoritarian terror state, is unacceptable. Israel, aided by America and others, thwarted the attack. We stand in ironclad solidarity with the people of Israel against efforts by fanatics to ignite catastrophic regional war,” Raskin’s account tweeted.
There’s apparently some interpretation of ironclad and unwavering solidarity that covers an arms embargo.
But Rep. Raskin and Rep. Pelosi just had their staffers assemble a generic statement to reassure Jewish voters. Do they believe in the arms embargo letter that they signed on in the tweets of support after the attack? Either one?
The one thing we do know is that they don’t stand in ironclad or unwavering solidarity with the targets of Islamic terrorism. Instead they pander to the terrorists before switching around and pandering to their victims.
RELATED ARTICLE: