Tensions between the United States and Iran have reached a new peak, with signs of deeper U.S. military involvement. This escalation is already generating strong reactions in American politics and across the world.
Polls show that most Americans oppose direct military intervention. However, Dr. Yitzhak Mansdorf explains that public support could rise if the strikes are successful and lead to a sustainable monitoring mechanism accepted by Iran—or even regime change.
“But if the goals aren’t met,” he warns, “opposition will grow, especially if U.S. overseas interests or domestic security are harmed.”
Dr. Mansdorf also notes a deep political divide in Washington. “Republican sentiment largely supports the strikes, while Democratic sentiment is almost entirely opposed.” He adds that former President Trump doesn’t depend heavily on public approval to maintain political momentum, which gives him room to act independently.
“If military operations are halted—due to Congressional pressure or shifting public opinion—it may open a path for negotiations with Iran, potentially boosting its international standing,” he says.
Despite optimism and pride over Israel’s achievements, Dr. Mansdorf cautions: “A prolonged conflict could hurt Israel’s long-term interests. A swift and decisive victory is essential to ensure Iran’s nuclear program is crippled and missile attacks are stopped.”