- Reconciliation with Israel serves the interests of both parties
- Many other Arab-Israeli agreements have been signed since the 1967 'Three No's' Khartoum Summit
- The [Khartoum] 'Three No's' Summit was in 1967. Everything has changed since
- Why should we stay in 1967 and bear the consequences 

Source: Sudan TV

Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, chairman of Sudan's Sovereignty Council, said in an interview with Sudan TV on October 26, 2020 that "reconciliation is legitimate even with enemies." He explained that you can sign a reconciliation agreement with any country if it serves the interests of both parties, and he said that lifting sanctions on Sudan is part and parcel of this agreement. Al-Burhan added that a lot has changed since the "Three No's" resolution at the Khartoum Summit in 1967. He explained that the PLO and several Arab countries have signed agreements with Israel since then, and asked: "Why should we stay in 1967?" Al-Burhan stated that Sudan still believes that a Palestinian state must be established within the 1967 borders, but the Sudanese people cannot be left to carry the brunt of this responsibility alone.