Israel’s fraud and breach of trust offense is so vague it can turn “unethical” into “criminal” after the fact, empowering prosecutors and judges to enforce intuition instead of clear rules.
As Iran’s streets fill with protesters paying in blood for the basic right to vote, speak and dissent, Basic Law turns the camera inward and asks a sharper question: are Israelis, in the middle of their own democratic trench warfare, about to rewrite criminal law for principled reasons or for perfectly timed political gain?
Host Aylana Meisel uses a “magic trick” to strip the personalities out of the debate and walk you through the real issue: Israel’s fraud and breach of trust offense is so vague it can turn “unethical” into “criminal” after the fact, empowering prosecutors and judges to enforce intuition instead of clear rules.
You’ll learn why top legal scholars across Israel’s ideological spectrum have warned about this for decades, how a landmark Supreme Court case exposed the law’s arbitrariness and why global democracies are moving away from catch-all corruption charges. The result is a gripping framework for spotting the difference between rule of law and rule by headline...right when it matters most.
